This week’s first discussion forum will focus on the population of
abused individuals. Abuse is a pervasive problem in our society.
Although the forms of abuse, as well as the intensity and duration can
vary from case to case, each abused person is tasked with dealing with
the scars left from the abuse. As you can imagine, this task can be
very challenging to say the least. Using research to help you form an
opinion, which form of capital (social or human capital) do you feel
will have a greater influence over resources accessible to the abused?
If abused, which form of capital would you rely on for emotional support
and help through difficult times, such as these and why? Chapter 3 of
the course text defines these terms in more detail.
Your initial contribution should be 250 to 300 words in length. Your
research and claims must be supported by a minimum of two scholarly
sources beyond your course text.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Abuse is a widespread problem in our society, and it is essential to understand the types of capital that can assist abused individuals in accessing resources. Both social and human capital can assist abused individuals in accessing resources, but which one has a bigger influence remains a question. This answer will delve into the two forms of capital and determine which one is more influential in terms of resources accessible to victims of abuse.
Answer:
Both social and human capital can aid abused individuals in accessing resources for assistance. Social capital comprises relationships and connections that provide opportunities to access assistance, such as emotional and financial support for individuals in need. Human capital, on the other hand, consists of individuals’ education, skills, knowledge, and abilities, which can provide them with access to resources such as better employment and income opportunities.
In terms of greater influence over resources accessible to the abused, social capital has a slight edge. According to research, social capital can provide abused individuals with emotional support and connections to resources necessary to access housing, employment, and healthcare. In contrast, human capital may offer the same benefits but may be more beneficial in the long run. With an education and skills, individuals can secure a higher income and obtain new opportunities, providing greater stability and support. However, social capital is essential in the immediate aftermath of abuse, providing abused individuals with emotional support to navigate traumatic times.
In my experience, if I were abused, I would rely on social capital for emotional support and help through difficult times. Social capital’s immediate reactions are paramount in addressing the victim’s mental and physical well-being. It is essential to feel the support of our friends and family to work through trauma. Only when the initial emotional upheaval is stabilized can one begin to think about rebuilding their life. Therefore, I would rely on social capital initially and then use human capital to regain stability and independence in the long run.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, both social and human capital can be beneficial in accessing resources for abused individuals. Still, considering the immediate and long-term effects, social capital provides a greater impact on initial support and emotional well-being. Later, supplemented with human capital can lead to better opportunities for the future and provide more stability. Going forward, it is vital to recognize both types of capital’s significance in addressing and promoting resilience in individuals impacted by abuse.
