Your skills that have been practiced throughout the course will be
assessed in this paper and conclude with you constructing your own
argument on a position. Your argument can be a contradiction, a
support, or an alteration of the argument you’ve research.
Whichever you choose should be sufficiently supported with materials
covered throughout the course and your own outside research.
This assignment should continue with the social issue research
conducted in Topic 2
In 750-1,000 words
- Summarize the position/argument researched. This should be
presented in a clear logical form. This includes translating their
rhetoric into: premises and conclusion, identifying the category of
propositions, and quality and quantity of the parts. - Identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences
from their communicated proposition to their position regarding
human dignity. - Construct a valid and sound argument that
contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the
organization.
At least three academic peer-reviewed sources are required for
this paper.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected. In-text citations and references
should be presented using APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer
to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This assignment measures programmatic competency
4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and
human dignity.
4.4: Construct ethical arguments.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, assignments and examinations are an integral part of evaluating the student’s performance. One such assignment that is given to medical college students is to construct their own argument on a position related to a social issue. In this answer, we will provide insight into the assignment’s requirements and how the students can approach it.
Answer:
The assignment requires the students to construct their own argument related to a social issue. The students have to choose a position- either contradict, support, or alter the argument they have researched. Their argument needs to be supported by materials covered in the course and their own outside research. The students also need to summarize the position/argument researched by presenting it in the form of premises and conclusion, identifying the category of propositions, and quality and quantity of the parts. This will help the students to understand the organization’s position clearly.
Further, the students must identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences from their communicated proposition to their position regarding human dignity. This will help the students to understand how the organization perceives human dignity. Finally, the students have to construct a valid and sound argument that contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the organization.
To complete this assignment, the students have to refer to at least three academic peer-reviewed sources. Although APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected. In-text citations and references should be presented using APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Lastly, it is essential to note that this assignment measures programmatic competency 4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and human dignity, and 4.4: Construct ethical arguments. The students’ ability to construct an argument ethically and examine the connections between ethical communication and human dignity is evaluated through this assignment.
Conclusion:
The medical college student’s ability to construct an argument ethically and communicate it effectively is essential for their professional development. The aforementioned assignment fosters critical thinking and analytical skills that are crucial in the medical profession. Therefore, as a medical professor, it is essential to design assignments that promote holistic development and enhance the student’s professional competencies.
