| |
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
|
4
Good
87.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
10.0 %Discussion of the Background of the Issue
|
The background of the chosen issue is not present.
|
The background of the chosen issue is present but incomplete.
|
The background of the chosen issue is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
The background of the chosen issue is present. Discussion is thorough and defines specific elements but is not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
The background of the chosen issue is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
10.0 %Proposal of a Solution
|
A proposed solution is not present.
|
A proposed solution is present but incomplete.
|
A proposed solution is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
A proposed solution is clearly present but is not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
A proposed solution is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
10.0 %Suggested Ways That the Proposed Solution Meets the Needs of the Population
|
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population are not present.
|
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population are present but incomplete.
|
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population are present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population are thorough but are not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
Ways that the proposed solution meets the needs of the population are clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
10.0 %Proposal for a Change Process That Implements the Delivery Model of the Proposed Solution
|
A change process that proposes how it can be used to implement the delivery model of the proposed solution is not present.
|
A change process is proposed that can be used to implement the delivery model of the proposed solution is present but incomplete.
|
A change process is proposed that can be used to implement the delivery model of the proposed solution is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
A change process is proposed that can be used to implement the delivery model of the proposed solution is thorough but is not as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
A change process is proposed that can be used to implement the delivery model of the proposed solution is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
15.0 %Expected Outcomes
|
The expected outcomes are not present.
|
The expected outcomes are present but incomplete.
|
The expected outcomes are present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
The expected outcomes are present but not are as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
The expected outcomes are clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
15.0 %Discussion of the Implications of the Proposed Solutions That Are Realistic and Aligned With Current and Future Health Care Financing
|
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is not present.
|
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is presented but is incomplete.
|
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level.
|
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements but not is as complete as expected. Information presented is from scholarly but dated sources.
|
A discussion of the implications of the proposed solutions that are realistic and aligned with current and future health care financing is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
5.0 %APA Format
|
Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations are not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
|
The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
