1. Think about the ethical theories and approaches in Chapter 4 and the moral conflicts you have experienced in the past. Have you used one of these approaches to resolving conflict? Which theory or approach have you used?
2. Has there ever been a time when you have experienced the dilemma of having to make a choice that you know will affect the well-being of another individual? Have you ever experienced moral suffering?
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
Ethics play a crucial role in the field of medicine, and as a medical professor, it is important for me to understand and teach students about various ethical theories and approaches. These theories and approaches help guide healthcare professionals in making morally sound decisions and resolving conflicts that may arise in their practice. In this response, we will explore my personal experiences with ethical conflicts and the theories/approaches I have used.
Answer 1:
Throughout my career, I have encountered numerous moral conflicts, many of which required careful analysis and decision-making. When facing such conflicts, I have often relied on the deontological approach, specifically the principle of beneficence. This approach emphasizes the importance of acting in the best interest of the patient and promoting their well-being, even if it means going against personal desires or beliefs.
By applying the principle of beneficence, I have been able to prioritize the welfare of the patient above all else, ensuring that their needs and interests are at the forefront of the decision-making process. This approach has helped me maintain a patient-centered perspective and make choices that align with ethical principles.
Answer 2:
In the medical profession, there have been occasions where I have faced the dilemma of making choices that directly impact the well-being of another individual. These situations often involve difficult decision-making and can lead to moral suffering, where the healthcare provider experiences anguish or distress due to the perceived moral implications of their actions.
One particular instance that stands out is when I had to decide whether to proceed with a risky surgical procedure for a patient with multiple comorbidities. While the surgery had the potential to improve the patient’s condition, it also carried significant risks that could further harm their overall well-being.
In such a situation, I experienced moral suffering as I grappled with the responsibility of making a choice that could have profound consequences for the patient’s health. Ultimately, I considered the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence, aiming to respect the patient’s autonomous choices while weighing the potential benefits and harms of the procedure.
Conclusion:
As a medical professor, I understand the importance of ethical theories and approaches in guiding healthcare professionals through moral conflicts. By reflecting on my personal experiences, I have applied the deontological approach, particularly the principle of beneficence, to resolve conflicts and make decisions that prioritize the well-being of patients. I have also encountered instances where the well-being of others was at stake, leading to moral suffering and requiring a careful evaluation of ethical principles. Through these experiences, I emphasize to my students the significance of ethical decision-making in providing quality healthcare.